gotstang.com forums logo
back to gotstang.com
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 29 of 29
  1. #26
    NoSlo5.0 is offline
    Never Satisfied... NoSlo5.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Russellville AR
    Posts
    952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 04redmach1
    I raced a 89 GT stock, and V-6 had dual exhaust and K&N.
    I beat em by 2 cars. May have been car wasnt taken care of or it was just a turd. Point is the 5.0 wasnt THAT fast to begin with.

    But go jump on the new 4.0 with a stock 5.0 ,and yu will get ur feelings hurt.
    You should have done a lot better than 2 car lengths. Mach's are mid to high 13 second cars bone stock right? Seems like most 5.0's were running mid to high 14's stock, mine ran 15's flat in stock trim (Hawaii air not so good as Englishtown).

    Besides, who has a stock 5.0 these days? Nobody I know...

    [

  2. #27
    04redmach1 is offline
    autosoundandperformance
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Columbus GA USA
    Posts
    399

    Default

    no no not in the mach. in the V-6 . My mach would blow the doors off stock 5.0 . My moms V-6 is what beat the 5.0 . Her little V-6 would fly. It had the ford racing headers, and true dual exhaust on it, with K&N.
    I was surprised.

  3. #28
    Leo is offline
    Gotstang? Newbie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    miami fl us
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by White Stang
    Your car is alot lighter than a 99 to 04. your engine is probally around 200 horses stock and more torque compared to the modular 220 at the wheels so I would not jump on the push rod engine beats modular engine. The Facts are the Modular Overhead Cam Motor is the best thing since VTEC I have a 2 valve modular and live in Ft Lauderdale Maybe we'll line up at the track one day if you head up there
    log on to www.305sr.com alot of people from ft lauderdale and south florida log on there, we have meets and everything its not a car club its an enthusiast website just like gotstang but theres more then just mustangs.


    I believe the modulars Leo's bustin on are the non PI headed 96-98's. They did suck bad.
    you hit the nail on the head.

    no no not in the mach. in the V-6 . My mach would blow the doors off stock 5.0 . My moms V-6 is what beat the 5.0 . Her little V-6 would fly. It had the ford racing headers, and true dual exhaust on it, with K&N.
    what tranny did the 5oh have and what did the v6 have? alot of it could have to do with driver error. i only know 2 v6 mustangs that can blow the doors off alot of cars and one of them has a beautiful twin turbo setup.


    lets keep this 5.0 vs 4.6 discussion the thread is getting very interesting

    "World peace is that moment in time when everyone takes a few moments to reload..."

  4. #29
    CallawayGT is offline
    Member of the Year CallawayGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    West Plains MO USA
    Posts
    658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leo
    i think fords worst move was to make the modular engine.

    Yeah, I really hate having over 300fwhp with 4.10s through a 5spd and getting 25hwy mpg.Hell, why did we even go fuel inection?I sure do miss adjusting points too.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •