FIRST OFF i gave my opinion, and if you dont like it you didnt have to read it,
as for why i am going to a v6 its for several reasons, i am not trying to beat gt's i am only comparing the 2
and why some people would actually consider fixing up a v6
and btw YOU ARE WRONG about the hp rating for a 1997-98 gt it was actually 215-225 hp (the 1999-2003 has 265 hp)
now as for the money lets see i can get a good quality 1997 v6 vert (under 80,000 miles) for bout 3500 dollarsthe gt is 8500-9500 dollars, my insurance would be 225 a month instead of 130 (savings of 1140 a year), my gas would cost me 45.00 a week instead of 30.00 a week ( 780-800 a year savings for the v6)
so lets see with the purchase price and the savings for gas and insurance i saved $6400 dollars,
now even if i spend 3500 dollars on my v6 for new heads a supercharger and a 8.8 rearend, i am ahead of the game by 2900-3000 this dont even inclued the next few years savings i will have,
no my v6 will not smoke a gt, but it will be sporty fast and scare the shyt out of most gt's when they dont leave me in the dust i may not beat them but they will find me on their a$$
i would like to know where you got your weights, for the 1997 vert and coupe, mine were from the dealer your gonna tell me the hard top and 1/4 of an engine (2 cylinders heads intake block ect) only weights 200 pounds!
i didnt get into torque as i dont know what the ratings would be with any mods on the v6 i know it would be less than the stock v8
if you would like to see the hp differences between years and models
go here--->
http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history_eng.htm
****** AND BTW Joe Friday ITS NOT WHAT YOU GOT ITS HOW YOU USE IT, and bigger is not allways better. If that was true you wouldn't keep hitting your fat head on the top of dah car when you get out ****