hunts

[lxexpress]

ya know...it never ceases to amaze me about submitting hunt claims,even after i put in a comment(when the hunt was submitted) about how my speedo is reversed to the u.s ones because i'm in canada and our speedos read in k.p.h. on the top and miles underneath,some dope has the nerve to write "170 right!" as a comment and voted it fake. http://www.gotstang.com/thehunt.php?list=1&hcidq=13465 almost makes me wonder if some people cant READ!!!

[YsOffcr]

Maybe they can't read Canadian......or English for that matter. :lol:

[Squid]

Is it "can't" or realistically is it "didn't" ??

Jim

[91GT347]

Well Scott. If you would buy a damn american car,you wouldn't have this problem !!! lmao

[GW269]

Metrics Suck!! :fu:

[crimsonblack]

I remember that one. Got my valid. I remember the comments too. I don't even remember the hunt requesting that the car really be moving at that speed for real, only that the speedometer be showing it... and that the photos be at two different angles. The photos met all the requirements whether metric or not.

[lxexpress]

Is it "can't" or realistically is it "didn't" ??

Jim
the jury is still out on that one!!!!!!

[lxexpress]

I remember that one. Got my valid. I remember the comments too. I don't even remember the hunt requesting that the car really be moving at that speed for real, only that the speedometer be showing it... and that the photos be at two different angles. The photos met all the requirements whether metric or not.
well,what am i supposed to do..buy a u.s. speedo..put it in,not write a comment so the crack smokers dont have to give it a 2nd look??? holy shit.i think maybe a safety issue is involved here too.at the track or not..still not the brightest thing to do

[Nicoleb3x3]

I think everyone aggrees your photo's met the hunt criteria
..perhaps they jumped to conclusions they shouldn't have and they made a mistake

didn't you know that was me?

I'M JUST KIDDING!!!!!!

[lxexpress]

they could have at least wrote back on another comment saying they made a mistake

[crimsonblack]

Well... there still some people that are voting fake on every hunt posted. I notice it when going through them. There will be like 20 valid votes and one fake for ten straight hunt items regardless of who it is.

... no it isn't me. :)

[lxexpress]

j will know who it is.....take away their voting rights...if you arent gonna take the time to vote properly find something else to do...like,go play in traffic!

[FnsweetS3]

j will know who it is.....take away their voting rights...if you arent gonna take the time to vote properly find something else to do...like,go play in traffic!

Amen... it is like ranking cars.... if you are just going to do the negative... then why do it at all? People!

[crimsonblack]

That goes both ways with the hunt. There are more people voting valid on fake hunts than voting fake on the valid hunts. But we aren't worrying about those because they get you the points you want. If you're going to rate everyone's website as a ten when they aren't, then why do it. It's the same with regular face-offs. How does a car with four photos beat a car (any car) that has sites showing every aspect of their car - engine, exterior, interior, etc.? It happens because of the way people want to vote. It's also wrong to try and control part of the group. If you will selected the people voting bad on everything then you need to select the people who are voting good on everything as well. It's just seem ridiculous to have J do all that extra work to keep rounding up a few bad apples. It hasn't changed anything in the HUNTS making people leave a comment for a fake vote.

[StangLou]

Ive noticed that there is "one" person sticking out and being a pain. I saw one where they said the voted fake because the person did a poor parking job or something like that. Some people's gene pool needs a filter....

[crimsonblack]

That "ONE" could surely be me. If the hunt says "PARKED IN A HANDICAP SPOT" that doesn't mean sitting sideways taking up three parking spots. That's not "parked" in a spot. If you're taking the time to do the hunts then do them correctly. Your car "next to" doesn't mean on the other side of a fence, in the background, across the way, or whatever. It means your car beside the object in question. It's not enough that someone attempted to do the hunt, you have to do the hunt the way it's written. Why are we voting if it doesn't matter?

[91GT347]

People will vote however they want,no matter what. When I vote.like crimson said,"next to" doesnt mean 200 yards across a parking lot.But when I look at ones like the "Handicap spot" mentioned above,they could have just as easily pulled in the spot straight.So I give them credit for that. Technically,it is in the handicaped spot.It's just in another spot too.The hunt doesnt say NO DOUBLE PARKING.lol